|
In the News
"We've Certainly Come a Long Way Baby! But Can We Stay There?"
by Cheryl L. Green
The number of women and minority executives in corporate America is increasing. Just consider these statistics: In 1995, a mere 8.7 percent of corporate officers in Fortune 500 companies were held by women. Today, that number has swelled to 15.7 percent, up from 12.5 percent in 2000. And, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's 2001 private employment survey, 35.9 percent of corporate senior officials and managers are women. Women of color represent 1.6 percent of corporate officers, up from 1.3 percent in 2000, according to the Catalyst census.
The placement of more women and minorities at the senior levels in organizations has been earned. Better education, training, experience have positioned them well to compete and serve. What may have started as affirmative action and EEO initiatives in corporations has evolved to a true appreciation that diversity improves the bottom line. Researchers have found that workforce diversity leads to improved problem solving and decision making, enhanced creativity and innovation, and greater corporate flexibility, and more effective use of the non-traditional white male talent in the organization. (Creating the Multicultural Organization - by Taylor Cox)
But once these talented and educated women or minorities climb to the top, are companies doing what it takes to retain them? To answer that question, I have to pose another one: With the increased focus on executive coaching as a key strategy in executive and leadership development, are senior executives equipped to further develop their key women and minority executives?
The difficulty in answering these questions became apparent to me after receiving a series of coaching engagements for senior executive women and minorities. They were bright, talented, and valued by their organizations—but were perceived as having a leadership skill deficit. I was being asked to coach them on a variety of behaviors to enhance their effectiveness in managing their people, time or business. An unfortunate pattern seemed to be emerging. Yes, there may have been developmental needs, but more importantly, the issues seemed to be solvable with effective performance management by their CEO bosses.
One of the more severe cases was of a talented black woman, "Sue," who was the head of multi-function department in a client organization. She has been a great spokesperson for the company, and was well-known in the local African-American community. But there were issues…. From the CEO on down, there were frequent complaints about Sue. She lacked focus and knowledge about the details of her department. She was unprepared for meetings, and failed to respond to voicemails and emails. She lacked industry knowledge even though they had suggested she take a couple of classes sponsored by industry associations to gain the fundamentals.
After a few meetings and interviews I could put the pieces of the puzzle together. The CEO was angry and frustrated after having been supportive of her development and not seeing any or minimal improvement. When I arrived on the scene, he was emphatic that she had 60 days to fix this. I suggested a few scenarios that would require his involvement. He refused saying "She has to fix this!"
I later discovered that Sue's behavior had been an issue for two years. Why had they allowed it to go on this long? A few reasons surfaced. One was Sue's visibility in the external community. The second was that the company's reputation with the African American employees was problematic. Since Sue was the highest ranking black female, the CEO wouldn't want to shake things up.
A third, and rather disturbing, supposition on my part was that the CEO, generally a demanding and direct manager, was uncomfortable in managing a black female. Perhaps he was not providing the direct feedback needed to effect a change in behavior. Or, when confronted with Sue's defensiveness or lack of self awareness, was uncomfortable asking for help. Or, the risk of dealing with a "protected class" (i.e. a woman or minority) executive as he would a white male was too great. It could be a public relations nightmare. This is why, I deduced, he had finally given up and concluded that this was essentially "her problem". Thus absolving himself of any responsibility for what had happened. It was best left unresolved - or left to work itself out during a layoff or restructuring.
Despite stories like this, there are potential solutions to address what I see as chronic conditions in corporate America: the glass ceiling phenomenon and the desire to retain women and minorities. Here are a few tips based on my work with clients: women, minorities, and white male executives. Although there is quite a bit of work that needs to be done, they provide hope for resolving organizational issues like the cases presented here.
Tips for corporate leaders to address the glass ceiling and retention issues
Get out and see the issues from the other side.
A colleague recently commented that the biggest surprise he had in being assigned to lead his firm's diversity recruiting effort was that there was a problem—a problem in the perceptions of the firm by women and minorities and antagonism expressed by majority members in the firm and in the surrounding community. The fact that he had no idea of many of the concerns expressed was scary.
Ask your women and minority executives about their experiences in the company. If you want to retain them, check in frequently to forestall any issues. If they are reporting directly to you, ask questions during informal meetings or during scheduled performance conversations. Checking in at least semi-annually provides you an opportunity to learn of issues before they become major obstacles to retention.
|